翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ South Carolina State House ・ South Carolina State Museum ・ South Carolina State Transport Police Division ・ South Carolina State University ・ South Carolina State University School of Law ・ South Carolina statistical areas ・ South Carolina Stingrays ・ South Carolina Supreme Court ・ South Carolina Synod ・ South Carolina Technical College System ・ South Carolina Terminal Company ・ South Carolina v. Baker ・ South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc. ・ South Carolina v. Gathers ・ South Carolina v. Katzenbach ・ South Carolina v. North Carolina ・ South Carolina Warriors ・ South Carolina Western Extension Railway ・ South Carolina Western Railway ・ South Carolina Western Railway Station ・ South Carolina wine ・ South Carolina Wing Civil Air Patrol ・ South Carolina World War II Army Airfields ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 1825 ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 1971 ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 2013 ・ South Carolina's 2nd congressional district ・ South Carolina's 2nd congressional district special election, 1795 ・ South Carolina's 2nd congressional district special election, 1822 Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク South Carolina v. North Carolina ： ウィキペディア英語版 South Carolina v. North Carolina ''South Carolina v. North Carolina'', 558 U.S. 256 (2010) is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States settled a dispute between the states of South Carolina and North Carolina regarding which parties may intervene in litigation between two states over water rights. By a 5-4 vote, the Court held that an interstate water authority and the Duke Energy Corporation could intervene, while ruling unanimously that the city of Charlotte, North Carolina, could not. ==Background== In 1991, North Carolina's legislature passed the Interbasin Transfer Statute, which allowed for water to be transferred from one river basin into another. Only transfers greater than 2,000,000 gallons of water per day required permits, so smaller transfers were implicitly authorized without state approval. In granting or denying a permit, North Carolina's Environmental Management Commission was required to consider the necessity, reasonableness and beneficial effects, among other things, of the transfer to North Carolina’s interests; there was no requirement that they assess of the impact on a downstream state South Carolina objected to this because in times of drought, an interbasin transfer from the Catawba River (which runs through both states) could limit the amount of water available downstream in South Carolina. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「South Carolina v. North Carolina」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.